Fifty cents to save your nation # 1

Link



Fifty cents to save your nation # 1




I have faith in the American public. Many Americans are paralyzed with shock at the actions of our government unable to discern what is actually going on or how they can help fight the evil overwhelming our nation. “Fifty cents to save your nation…” will be a series of articles to help keep the public informed about social issues that affect us all and how to defend their rights with a sample letter and a fifty cent postage stamp.

Patriot and President John Adams was making a speech at a University when he declared that an informed citizenry should celebrate our independence from coast to coast during the Fourth of July. The reason he stated that citizens should stay informed is not because the enemy outside our borders, but the enemy within our government. As a lawyer he knew that certain powerful parties had the key to knowledge about law, that could be abused to subdue the uninformed general public. Our Founders understood the short comings of man and knew that Americans would always have to fight for and celebrate our freedoms. That is especially true now.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is about to eliminate Net Neutrality rules that were established to protect the rights of the citizens. If the FCC passes this new rule when they vote soon, it will actually be an attack on our rights to the First Amendment of free speech. Courts have held that the First Amendment only applies to the United States and State members of Congress. There are no protections under the First Amendment if a corporation violates your rights to freedom of expression. So what the Republican party led by President Donald Trump is really trying to do is to delegate authority to eliminate First Amendment rights with net neutrality rules. This will allow corporations such as twitter. Facebook, verizon, comcast or any other internet or telecommunications company to close down your website or other avenue to socialize or speak about public issues. If they pass this law, if you speak an undesirable truth about the government, they can retaliate by threatening to punish one of these companies if they do not limit your communications. Congress has already passed a retroactive law making telecommunication companies immune from lawsuits for engaging in warrantless surveillance to help the government spy on Americans. So if this new FCC rule passes, it will severely damage all of our freedoms under the First Amendment, eliminating our ability for any recourse. Moreover, these companies can start charging us more money and create more bills for us – to increase their profits. See Congress is not passing a law to abridge our First Amendment rights, the FCC which is a commission congress created, is creating a rule to eliminate our rights to free speech.
The First Amendment is our most precious right guaranteed in the United States Constitution. If you do not have First Amendment rights to legal redress against our government, then you have no way of getting your foot through the courthouse door so you can allege your other rights were violated. So any party or politician that threatens your rights under the First Amendment, is also putting your Eighth Amendment rights preventing cruel and unusual punishment in jeopardy. For example the suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, (many who have been proven to be innocent) are being denied First Amendment rights to access the courts with legal redress to escape unbridled torture. This is just one example of how important our First Amendment rights are and why every American must oppose any political party trying to abridge these rights – in any way. Denial of First Amendment rights eliminates all of your Constitutional rights and that is why you must take action.

At the website of http://www.congresslookup.com after you type in your address, you will have all the contact information for your federal and State representatives, including their facebook, twitter, youtube or other ways to contact them through social media. Add them as a friend so you can stay informed about what new rules, bills or laws they are trying to pass that will harm you, your family and friends. The squeaky wheel always gets the grease and you have to oppose their insanity to keep them honest. If you do not feel comfortable calling your representative, you can fax them your letters. Their fax numbers should be listed on their website. Fight for your rights or we will not have any freedoms. There is power in numbers so just passing this link to friends can help you save our nation from the unwise people trying to eliminate our form of government.

It is important to note that if your Congress member does not hear their telephone ringing constantly about a current bill, rule or law about to be passed, then they think their constituents have no problem with their actions. So citizens have to take action to defend their rights. Although Congress are supposed to represent the people of their state to defend their rights, they cater to powerful corporations to retain their own power, money and political future. Congress has to respond to every letter that they receive from the people of their state. Always speak or write in polite tones when addressing members of government otherwise you may wind up in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as a belligerent. The form letter addressed below is meant for you to copy, paste and edit as you wish so you can spend fifty cents to help save the rights of every American from the enemy within. Please call your Congressperson also. Our nation is in grave danger and Americans must fight for their freedoms every day. We can do this by staying informed and opposing wrongful or unlawful government conduct which harms people.

Federal Communications Commission
FCC Chairman, Ajit Pai (former Verizon CEO)
445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554
Congress #1
Congress#2 …

December 25, 2017

Re: Opposition to Net Neutrality abridging First Amendment rights

Honorable FCC Chairman and members of Congress,

I, and many other Americans oppose your new rule to eliminate net neutrality rules. This new rule will allow corporations to abridge freedom of speech and freedom to associate with impunity where citizens would have no recourse through the judicial branch for adequate relief. Many citizens get ripped off by online corporations everyday with faulty products or services or over billing after a service has been canceled. When we complain to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) we get an automated response that says if they get a lot of complaints about a single company they may pursue the matter. More or less the American consumer gets property taken from us by corporations on a regular basis with no valid recourse through the FTC. The FCC is proposing a new rule to eliminate FCC net neutrality protections saying that we can rely on the FTC to protect our interests, but that commission is not able to offer adequate relief or needed consumer protections.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is about to eliminate Net Neutrality rules that were established to protect the rights of the citizens. If the FCC passes this new rule it will actually be an attack on our rights to the First Amendment of free speech. Courts have held that the First Amendment only applies to the United States and State members of Congress. There are no protections under the First Amendment if a corporation violates our rights to freedom of expression. So what the FCC is really trying to do is to delegate authority to eliminate First Amendment rights with net neutrality rules. This will allow a telecommunications company to close down our website or other avenue to socialize or speak about public issues. If they pass this rule, if we speak an undesirable truth about the government, they can retaliate by threatening to punish one of these companies if they do not limit our communications. Congress has already passed a retroactive law making telecommunication companies immune from lawsuits for engaging in warrantless surveillance to help the government spy on Americans which has eliminated our rights under the Fourth Amendment. So if this new FCC rule passes, it will severely damage all of our freedoms under the First Amendment and also eliminate our ability for any civil recourse. Please honor the U.S. Constitution and your oath of office by eliminating this new FCC net neutrality rule which can jeopardize our republican form of government. Our government should not use deceptive methods to eliminate Constitutional rights.

Determinedly,

 

____________________________
Name, Address & telephone #

Filing an Ethical Complaint Against a Member of Congress

Filing an Ethical Complaint Against a Member of Congress

Every member of the United States Congress is supposed to abide by the following list of ten ethical principles. However, the United States Department of Justice, Attorney General made a legal opinion within the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court which is heavily redacted and unreadable. The highlight of this opinion is that neither civil litigation or a criminal case will be viable against a member of Congress who violates these ethical principles, making them more or less obsolete. Not even the Congressional Ethics Committees seem to hold members of Congress up to these moral standards. We know this because Congress members and even the United States President constantly lie to the American public and there is nothing ethical about false statements.

As a matter of fact there is a criminal law titled,

“Statements or Entries Generally (False Statement Act) 18 U.S.C. § 1001, (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully-
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or documents knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism…, imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both….”

Can you tell me one member of government who is not violating this law? Special Counsel needs to stop government from lying to the American public by enforcing this law.

Americans should insist that members of Congress abide by all of these ethical principles. If your member of Congress has failed to abide by these principles you can file an ethics complaint against them at the addresses noted below. While sexual ventilation seems to be the only subject the ethical committees will even recognize, I think it is a far greater ethical violation against our republican form to lie to the American public and secretly pass laws with hidden amendments and closed hearings. That is what corrupted our members of Congress in the first instance, secret court hearings within the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. (FISC)

United States Senate Select Committee on Ethics
c/o U. S. Senator _________ to sponsor complaint
220 Hart Building
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
T: (202) 224-2981
F: (202) 224-7416

Committee on Standards of Official Conduct
HT-2, The Capitol
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: 202-225-7103
Fax: 202-225-7392

Please contact your Congress members and tell them to vote “NO” on extending Section 702 of the (FISA) Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. There is an enemy within our government hiding in the shadows trying to eradicate our form of government to eliminate all of our Constitutional rights. Thoroughbred Americans must do more than just VOTE to protect our freedoms, or we will not have any rights. God bless the people who do research and those who picket to oppose these unconscionable laws.
Who was the United States Attorney General who made the legal opinion that the ethical principles listed below could not be enforced with civil or criminal laws? Congress voted unanimously to appoint him as a United States Supreme Court Justice, supposedly to uphold the United States Constitution where he now sits – with impunity.

The Code of Ethics for Government Service, H. Con. Res. 175 (85th Congress)
“The Code of Ethics for Government Service sets out ten standards of conduct that should be adhered to by all government employees, including officeholders.”

Those ten (10) tenets were found in a manual for the United States military, Army Regulation 600-50, “Standards of Conduct for Department of the Army Personnel” (Page 23, Appendix D)

“Code of Ethics for Government Service
Any person in Government service should –

a. Put loyalty to the highest moral principles and to country above loyalty to persons, party, or Government department.

b. Uphold the Constitution, laws, and regulations of the United States and of all governments therein and never be a party to their evasion.

c. Give a full day’s labor for a full day’s pay; giving earnest effort and best thought to the performance of duties.

d. Seek to find and employ more efficient and economical ways of getting tasks accomplished.

e. Never discriminate unfairly by the dispensing of special favors or privileges to anyone, whether for remuneration or not; and never accept, for himself or herself or for family members, favors or benefits under circumstances which might be construed by reasonable persons as influencing the performance of governmental duties.

f. Make no private promises of any kind binding upon the duties of office, since a Government employee has no private word which can be binding on public duty.

g. Engage in no business with the Government, either directly or indirectly, which is inconsistent with the conscientious performance of Government duties.

h. Never use any information gained confidentially in the performance of governmental duties as a means of making private profit.

i. Expose corruption wherever discovered.

j. Uphold these principles, ever conscious that public office is a public trust.”

Vuono, C., (1988), “Standards of Conduct for Department of the Army Personnel” (Army Regulation 600-50 Update) Publicly available on page 23, at Appendix D
https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/AR_600-50_01-28-1988.pdf

Humanitarian

Majestic Publishers, the owner Dale Brent Adams (DOB: 08/25/1964), it’s affiliates and customers denounce any and all acts of threats, coercion, violence or terror in any form or fashion by any party or under color of law by a government. We observe Judeo-Christian ethics holding a high regard for the value of human life with dignity.

Wild Wild West GOP Radicalism

Wild Wild West GOP Radicalism

In the Wild West the most prominent law firm was Smith & Wesson with the quickest draw. When our judicial branch moved West with the rule of law it enabled people to resolve disputes with dignity within the courts. This allowed people to have a legal remedy for harm without resorting to violence. When people didn’t have this vehicle they were forced to defend their rights with violence. It is important to note that the First Amendment rights of the Constitution allow for the access to courts of law to settle disputes.

United States President Donald Trump has alleged that the reason we have domestic radicalism is because we allow immigrants to migrate to America. I disagree, I believe people are becoming radicalized because of the thoughtless actions of Republican appointed members to the judiciary who have no regard for our nation’s values and the importance of First Amendment rights. When the courts allow our government to side step Constitutional limitations to torture and murder innocent people and then deny them First Amendment rights to a legal remedy, they are inciting violence with a bull horn. The First Amendment guards every other right by allowing a person to seek legal redress from the courts.

For a half decade the United States Supreme Court upheld the fair pleading standards established in Conley v. Gibson, 355 U. S. 41 (1957). This allowed even prisoners the right to file lawsuits with limited evidence and granted a reasonable amount of discovery evidence to prove their claims. Correctional officers had an incentive not to mistreat residents for fear of a civil action. This fair legal remedy created a check and balance system where civil and Constitutional rights were honored and it also limited violent riots and deaths to residents or correctional officers. However, since 2007, when the Supreme Court overruled Conley v. Gibson, with Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007), prison violence is becoming more regular because naturally the correctional officers are abusing this neglected class of citizens who have no viable legal remedy the First Amendment was supposed to guarantee to all citizens. Prison food now contains maggots, yet the residents have no valid ability to enter the courts and win their case for humane treatment. Americans are allowing our government to torture and kill innocent people from other nations, so now the government is stretching that power to abuse our own citizens.

Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007), defeats a person’s ability to obtain his every Constitutional right. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) were established with fairness to obtain justice with discovery procedures so a party would be required to provide evidence to prove the plaintiff’s claims. Twombly has eliminated a plaintiff’s ability to even pass the stage of service of process before their claims are dismissed and this problem is in epidemic proportions. This case law applied specifically to a limited class of companies.

However, two years later, in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U. S. ____ (2009), the U. S. Supreme Court broadened these high pleading standards to more federal cases making it almost impossible for the government to be held accountable for abuse of anti-terrorism legislation. Honorable Justice Kennedy made this decision. Both Twombly and Iqbal will adversely affect you if your rights are ever violated and you want to pursue a civil action to get a remedy and relief. Chances are very high that your lawsuit will be dismissed and all the money you spent on a lawyer lost.

In the Eighth Circuit the courts have upheld Wright Langhammer v Suhl, 2009 WL 2176584 (E.D. Ark., July 17, 2009), using technicalities to get more lawsuits dismissed. This case should be overruled to re-establish the rule of law for the minority and the less advantaged. However, the Eighth Circuit being well packed with Republican appointed Judges who are pro corporation (although they are supposed to be neutral) and employees are more like slaves in this district.

For more valuable information on how our First Amendment rights have been obliterated by Republican appointed judges see the following citation.

Klein, Kenneth, (2009), “Ashcroft v. Iqbal Crashes Rule 8 Pleading Standards      on to Unconstitutional Shores” California Western School of Law. Publicly        available at http://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?            article=1057&context=fs

 

Life is hard and it doesn’t make any sense to make it harder on people, especially a judicial branch that is supposed to offer unbiased fairness. Corporate legal teams are aggressively creating case law within states to deny employees fairness in workers compensation cases. So although this law was fair when it was created by statute, the courts are limiting an employees right to even get paid after an injury. If you file a claim so you can take care of your family, the odds are high the company will try to fire you.

Moreover, these legal teams are intent on fighting every case when employees try to get unemployment. Republican appointed judges lean in favor of corporations and it is sometimes impossible for an employee to get unemployment benefits from certain companies if an adverse event occurs. These laws were created by the legislature to create fairness to the employer and the employee, but the courts have made these laws stricter. What it boils down to is legalized slavery without some type of a relief valve if you are met with sudden misfortune. You either work or you are fired, whether you are sick or injured. The American people and all their precious rights to fairness are under attack, sadly by the courts and we have no viable claims for a remedy or relief. So no wonder our government has people fighting amongst themselves. Many Americans are bitter and angry attacking each other, but the real instigators are the hardliners within the judiciary that are destroying the fabric of our nation and the people. President Trump is also taking full advantage of this turmoil to create conflict. These public officials are literally tearing our nation apart.

In Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U. S. ___ (2010), United States Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts obliterated First Amendment rights. Our rule of law has always held that a person is not guilty of a crime until they have been convicted. However, Congress has created language of “suspected terrorists,” granting the government the right to punish these people outside a regularly constituted court. Thus, the executive branch can strip these people of any civil or Constitutional rights by threatening or coercing them to provoke violence. The one question you should ask when an alleged terrorist attack occurs is how long was the executive branch investigating them and what did they do to these people to provoke them to anger. People are compiling research on suspected terrorist convictions but nobody so far is investigating how long they were under investigation or how were they being treated by public and private parties. Truth is many of these suspects are either killing themselves or killed by the government so we will never know how long the government was investigating or torturing these people.

In Humanitarian Law Project the court held that these victims of abuse whether aliens or Americans, can not have access to a lawyer denying them First Amendment rights to challenge government abuse until they are detained for some type of crime. Any lawyer who does try to help these suspects can be convicted of material support for terrorism. Since these anti-terrorism laws can not be challenged with a lawyer in court, these laws will never be held as UnConstitutional. Although Congress has held that coercion is a violation of federal law, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals (mostly appointed by GOP) has held that it is lawful for employers to coerce employees to trick them out of their job, career and retirement. The government (at least within the Eighth Circuit) appears to be using this legal opinion as a lawful right for law enforcement to coerce suspected terrorists to trick them into a criminal conviction.

This nonsense by the U.S. Supreme Court that a citizen does not have Constitutional rights until they are detained leads to guaranteed convictions with no chance of Constitutional liberty. It also leads to terrorism and violence because people rightfully do not enjoy being abused and must have some channel to ventilate their frustrations. The Robert’s court is closed to these victims so the Supreme Court is instigating violence and terrorism by denying First Amendment rights. Congress held in the material support for terrorism statute that First Amendment rights were to be protected, yet the Supreme Court, who is the guardian of our Constitution and supposed to honor the intent of Congress, eliminated First Amendment rights.

There was a class based system of serfs and Nobles in England where a hard working person could never be a landowner. Our Founders when writing to the King of England for the purpose of negotiating a peaceful resolution were met with the arrogance of a Noble who viewed them as serfs. The Constitution was formed to forever eradicate these class based systems and tyranny. That is why the phrase, “All men were created equal,” came into play making it law that all people had a right to be heard to avoid conflicts. They furthered this intent with the First Amendment. The Republican party seem to be engaged in high crimes and misdemeanors destroying our republican form of government and converting it into a communist government. They are creating legalized slavery of serfs unable to ever be a landowner with their consistent attacks on the middle class. They are dodging the prohibitions of the Eighteenth Amendment by not discriminating, they want to make every race a slave. The Republican party has overthrown the Constitution and all our rights. Their laws are creating violence by denying First Amendment rights. When lawlessness increases they will simply make more indomitable laws, hire more militant police that have no regard for the value of human life, which will fully convert our nation to military communist rule. This can be avoided by honoring the brilliance of our Founding Fathers who must have been enlightened individuals well ahead of their time that understood the importance of human nature, not mistreating others and the essential doctrine of a remedy and relief. The First Amendment.

Americans should not engage in gnashing of teeth harming each other, you should join a political party and engage in Operation Clean House. Vote out every sitting politician State, County, Local and especially Federal, until they honor our brilliant forefathers and the beauty of the Constitution. Vote for your rights because you do not have civil and Constitutional rights within the judicial system. Try it and see. Ask any lawyer about Twombly and Iqbal. More importantly, it would be an excellent idea to take college courses on being a paralegal so you can learn how to read and study the diabolical laws our government are trying to pass. It will open your eyes to great danger.

First Amendment rights complaint

Library of Congress
Office of Inspector General
101 Independence Avenue S.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20540-1060
T: (202) 707-6314

October 22, 2017

Re: First Amendment rights complaint

Hello,
On June 13, 2017, at 11:56 pm, I made a web based complaint to the Library of Congress General Inquiries form online. [Exhibit A] When I did not get a response within a reasonable period of time I later filed a complaint directly with the Library of Congress, Office of Inspector General (OIG). On October 4, 2017, Mr. Lester A. Davis of the OIG sent me the enclosed response. [Exhibit B] My company of Majestic Publishers Inc., the Rutherford Institute and I have been harmed by this undue delay. “Justice delayed is justice denied.” (Wm. Gladstone)
Since I did not receive a timely response I did web searches of my own to find the Preassigned Control Number (PCN) location without any guidance from this staff. In my haste I somehow noted the wrong ISBN number of my book, “Care Giving Made Easy – How to be an Awesome Caregiver,” on the PCN website. Although I contacted two staff members about this mistake they did not even bother to respond to me and inform me how I should proceed. When I called Sherry McCoy she stated that she had changed the ISBN for me. However, somehow this has caused me and my company irreparable harm because the Library of Congress informed Lulu publishing company that I could not even use a Library of Congress number in the newest version of my book. Teri Watkins of Lulu publishing did not elaborate the excuse the Library of Congress used so it must have been somewhat unpleasant. It is possible the LOC staff were retaliating against me for expressing First Amendment rights. So now I do not have a print version of this book with the PCN so I can send a copy to the correct address of the Library of Congress. Thus, this undue delay and lack of communication has effectively deprived me of the right to have a valid PCN for my book. The full extent of how this will adversely affect me and my business is not yet clear. For example, I published the following Press Release to give a free book away to six (6) public libraries and if they use the PCN for their file system, they may not even accept these free books, harming my promotional efforts. Moreover, all the profits from these book sales go directly to the Rutherford Institute a legal firm that defends Constitutional rights. So, if the Library of Congress has caused any serious harm to these book sales, then they have harmed this non-profit organization.
I expected professional courteous service from the Library of Congress, especially from the Office of Inspector General. It appears to me that the conduct of the staff at the Library of Congress was all coordinated for the specific purpose of depriving me the option of having a Library of Congress number on my book and they have succeeded. I do not appreciate this shady conduct. I never had any problems from the Library of Congress under the direction of United States President George W. Bush, nor President Barack Obama.
I suspect that the United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Jeff Sessions is somehow involved to abridge my First Amendment rights. On April 29, 2016, my Mother Nancy Ellen Mayberry signed a notarized affidavit attesting to my First Amendment rights. [Exhibit C]. Notice on paragraph 17, how the ISBN numbers are designated. The Department of Justice seems to be trying to invalidate this evidence by conspiring with your office to ensure there are some changes. Jeff Sessions swore an oath to defend the United States Constitution as a member of Congress and as the Attorney General yet he seems to be intentionally engaged in conduct that abridges First Amendment rights. Jeff Sessions and the Library of Congress are acting contrary to law and Constitutional authority to cause me, my company and the Rutherford Institute harm.

Signed and mailed on this 23rd day of October, 2017.

Respectfully submitted.

 

_____________________________
Dale B Adams
Majestic Publishers Inc.
2313 Anvil Drive
Harrison, Ar. 72601
T: (870) 204-0131
E: info@majesticpublishers.com
W: http://www.majesticpublishers.com

cc: Rutherford Institute

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Dale B Adams, pro se do declare that on this 22nd day of October, 2017, I have mailed the enclosed, “First Amendment rights complaint,” on each party to the above proceeding or that party’s counsel, and on every other person required to be served, by depositing an envelope containing the above documents in the United States mail properly addressed to each of them and with first-class postage prepaid, or by delivery to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within three (3) calendar days.
The names of those served are as follows:

United States President Donald Trump
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20500

Library of Congress
Office of Inspector General
101 Independence Avenue S.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20540-1060
T: (202) 707-6314

Solicitor General
Room 5614, Dept of Justice
950 Pennsylvania, Ave, N.W.
Washington D.C. 20530-0001

Signed on this 22nd day of October, 2017.

Sincerely,

 

_____________________________
Dale B Adams
Majestic Publishers Inc.
2313 Anvil Drive
Harrison, Ar. 72601
T: (870) 204-0131
E: info@majesticpublishers.com
W: http://www.majesticpublishers.com

 

[Exhibit A]
Library of Congress
General Inquiries Form online
Ask a Librarian
Question ID: 12574926

In 2006, Dale B. Adams of Majestic Publishers authored the book, “Care Giving Made Easy How to be an Awesome Caregiver,” ISBN No. 0-9677958-1-8. Copyright ©2006 which was cataloged with the Library of Congress Control Number: 2006927387 and located at the website of http://lccn.loc.gov/2006927387. This webpage is no longer active and after a search with the Library of Congress my book is not even in your files.

By what authority has the Library of Congress abridged my First Amendment rights by deleting my public works from the public record? Please also be advised that this intellectual property may be evidence in a government oversight investigation. Thus the Library of Congress may be violating the law obstructing justice and tampering with evidence by deleting these public records. The U.S. Supreme Court informed the United States Department of Justice in common law that an “as applied” civil case may be viable for written works that the government interferes with. Please inform me of any and all reasons my public works have been deleted from your records and who gave you the authority to do it.

I received an email from a government oversight advocacy group who stated that United States President Donald Trump had issued Executive Orders to delete a lot of government records. Pursuant to the Church Committee Reports the National Archives has rules about keeping historical records. Please inform me if the United States President is the party who is engaged in violating well-settled government norms as well as tampering with evidence and obstructing justice.

Thanking you in advance.

Sent by web based email transmission on this 13th day of June, 2017. (11:56 pm)
Respectfully submitted.

_____________________________
Dale B Adams
Majestic Publishers Inc.
2313 Anvil Drive
Harrison, Ar. 72601
P: (870) 204-5317
E: info@majesticpublishers.com
W: http://www.majesticpublishers.com

Majestic Publishers donates book to public libraries for First Amendment tour

Press Release

Majestic Publishers
Dale B. Adams
2313 Anvil Drive
Harrison, AR. 72601
T: (870) 204-0131

Majestic Publishers donates book to public libraries for First Amendment tour

(Harrison, AR). On October 23, 2017, Dale B. Adams of Majestic Publishers will be donating a free book to several public libraries in various cities during a First Amendment tour to Washington, D.C. The trip will begin in Harrison, Arkansas passing through Tennessee and Virginia to our nation’s capitol. A copy of the book, “Care Giving Made Easy – How to be an Awesome Caregiver,” will be given to the following libraries; The Boone County Library, Memphis Public Library, Nashville Public Library, Jefferson-Madison Regional Library, Richmond Public Library and the District of Columbia Public Library.

There will be a pause in the historical city of Charlottesville, Virginia where First Amendment rights recently led to some conflict. Our wise founders such as Thomas Jefferson and James Madison both worked on the First Amendment which was formed to guard every other Constitutional right and prevent conflicts. The First Amendment and the institutions who guard those rights seem to be undermined. Majestic Publishers supports the beauty of the First Amendment and every other right that should always be protected with it, if we are to remain a free nation and a free people.

Dale B. Adams formed Majestic Publishers in 1998-2000 in Champaign county, Illinois. In 1998, Adams published, “My Movie Collection,” and in 2006 authored the book, “Care Giving Made Easy – How to be an Awesome Caregiver,” while located in Corpus Christi, Texas. The First Amendment tour is to promote a new edition of this book that will be released in a few weeks. All the proceeds from these book sales are donated to the Rutherford Institute to help guard our Constitutional rights. Other publishing activities of Majestic Publishers have been abridged due to the constant struggle to fight for the “guaranteed” Constitutional rights which many Americans (including many members of our family) lost their lives fighting for, that our judiciary so willingly wipes away with the swiftness of a signature.

Majestic Publishers donates proceeds from book to the Rutherford Institute

Press Release

Majestic Publishers
Dale B. Adams
2313 Anvil Drive
Harrison, AR. 72601
T: (870) 204-5317

Majestic Publishers donates proceeds from book to the Rutherford Institute

(Harrison, AR). On October 14, 2017, Dale B. Adams finalized arrangements for the Rutherford Institute to obtain all royalties from the sales of the book, “Care Giving Made Easy – How to be an Awesome Caregiver.” The Rutherford Institute defends the diminishing civil and Constitutional rights of all Americans on a regular basis. The Rutherford Institute offers free legal services to victims who have had their Constitutional rights abridged and raises the funds to do this admirable work with donations.

You can contact the Rutherford Institute if you have a legal problem which implicates Constitutional rights. The address of the Rutherford Institute is P.O. Box 7482, Charlottesville, VA. 22906. Although they can not afford to take all cases, they know how to pick their battles and win victories for our Constitutional freedoms. Majestic Publishers donates to the Rutherford Institute on a regular basis because it is such a worthwhile cause to defend our rights.

First Amendment Press Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

CONTACT:

Majestic Publishers

Dale B. Adams

2313 Anvil Drive

Harrison, AR. 72601

P: (870) 741-4132

E: info@majesticpublishers.com

W: http://www.majesticpublishers.com

 

 

Majestic Publishers seeks law firm for violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

 

(Harrison, AR.) Dale B. Adams of Majestic Publishers is seeking legal counsel for violations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. (FISA) Dale Adams alleges he has evidence that the government intentionally violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights and well-settled law from the United States Supreme Court related to the First Amendment. It appears the government also violated Executive Order 12333 and Section 215 of the United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act USA PATRIOT Act of 2001. Pub. L. 107-56, 115 Stat. 272 (2001). Moreover, Dale Adams alleges that although the United States Department of Justice was aware that evidence was unlawfully obtained by the Presidents Surveillance Program (PSP) and should have been destroyed when the U. S. Supreme Court held it as Un-Constitutional, they used parallel construction to unlawfully continue their investigation.

 

Some of the evidence of these civil and criminal violations of law are appended below. (Exhibit A-C) United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales was ousted by Congress in 2007 after he signed an unlawful application or warrant regarding Dale B. Adams. United States Senator Mitch McConnell sponsored the Protect America Act of 2007 (PAA) which helped the government conceal these violations of criminal law. The Protect America Act gave the government the ability to circumvent the requirement for a warrant and allowed the government to just use certificates.

 

Dale B. Adams is unable to file a viable civil complaint on his own behalf due to the enhanced pleading standards established by the dominant force of the United States Supreme Court. Majestic Publishers Inc., seeks the help of a qualified law firm that is not afraid to stand up to government misconduct at every level of government.

 

Dale B. Adams formed Majestic Publishers in 2000, and is the author and self publisher of the new book, “Care Giving Made Easy – How to be an Awesome Caregiver.” His many experiences include being a Security Consultant, General Contractor and Energy Conservation Specialist. To learn more valuable money saving information visit:  http://www.majesticpublishers.com.

Majestic Publishers

Dale B. Adams

2313 Anvil Drive

Harrison, AR. 72601

P: (870) 741-4132

E: info@majesticpublishers.com

W: http://www.majesticpublishers.com

 

EXHIBIT A

 

From: info@majesticpublishers.com

Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 6:32 PM

To: abuse@rr.com

Subject: firewall breach

 

Hello,

 

The IP address of 72.183.252.69 tries to continually breach my firewall. I want the complete information of this source.

 

Please note that you need to make a record of this and any and all further corespondence. Reason being is I intend to pursue legal redress with all vigor and momentum if I am not satisfied with your response.

 

Determinedly,

 

Dale B. Adams

 

 

Majestic Publishers

Editor: Dale B. Adams

2014 Orange St.

Corpus Christi, TX. 78418

Ph: 361-939-8110

Http://www.majesticpublishers.com

Home of the new book, “Care Giving Made Easy – How to be an Awesome Caregiver.”

 

 

 

EXHIBIT B

 

From: info@majesticpublishers.com

Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:54 AM

To: aclu_satx@sbcglobal.net

Cc: abuse@rr.com

Subject: Communist Act aka Patriot Act

 

Hello,

 

I am having a problem down here in Corpus Christi, TX. For some strange reason my IP formerly located in CC is now located in Herdon, VA. A web search revealed that both Homeland Security and Time Warner conveniently have offices there. I have noticed disruptions to my online activities and believe that our government may be violating my 4th Amendment rights among others.

 

Is there any precedent where internet and computer records of your home are being illegally searched and seized by the government thus violating the 4th Amendment? Are there any pending cases on this matter and do you think it would be a viable or frivilous claim?

 

I am an author and publisher. If our government is creating records of books we buy and read it seems plausible that they would also monitor books as they are written. I could be considered a mild activist and they would not be thrilled with everything I write.

 

Shortly after I joined the Democratic Party and hauled away some trash for a business that is owned by a man of Indian decent my IP changed to 72.183.57.73. I keep getting firewall breaches from the IP address of 72.183.57.69 just 4 digits away from mine. When I send emails to rr@abuse.com they do not reply. When I try to look up this .69 IP on whois websites I come up blank with the info below.

 

OrgName:    Road Runner HoldCo LLC

OrgID:      RRSW

Address:    13241 Woodland Park Road

City:       Herndon

StateProv:  VA

PostalCode: 20171

Country:    US

 

ReferralServer: rwhois://ipmt.rr.com:4321

 

NetRange:   72.176.0.0 – 72.186.95.255

CIDR:       72.176.0.0/13, 72.184.0.0/15, 72.186.0.0/18, 72.186.64.0/19

NetName:    RRSW

NetHandle:  NET-72-176-0-0-1

Parent:     NET-72-0-0-0-0

NetType:    Direct Allocation

NameServer: DNS1.RR.COM

NameServer: DNS2.RR.COM

NameServer: DNS3.RR.COM

NameServer: DNS5.RR.COM

NameServer: DNS6.RR.COM

Comment:   

RegDate:    2005-11-21

Updated:    2006-06-06

 

OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE10-ARIN

OrgAbuseName:   Abuse

OrgAbusePhone:  +1-703-345-3416

OrgAbuseEmail:  abuse@rr.com

 

OrgTechHandle: IPTEC-ARIN

OrgTechName:   IP Tech

OrgTechPhone:  +1-703-345-3416

OrgTechEmail:  abuse@rr.com

 

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2006-09-19 19:10

# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN’s WHOIS database.

 

I have not been answered by Time Warner in re to this abuse by this IP. This IP successfully turned off my firewall today. I do not know if it belongs to the U.S. Government or if it is just some hacker. Since Time Warner will not respond to my complaints I intend to also sue them for violating my civil rights. I am also considering to sue any technology companies that provide our government with this eavesdropping equipment that assists them in violating the U.S. Constitution.

 

Is there an ACLU attorney located in Corpus Christi, TX. that I should discuss this matter with?

 

Thanking you in advance.

 

 

Kindly,

 

Dale Adams

 

Majestic Publishers

Editor: Dale B. Adams

2014 Orange St.

Corpus Christi, TX. 78418

Ph: 361-939-8110

Http://www.majesticpublishers.com

Home of the new book, “Care Giving Made Easy – How to be an Awesome Caregiver.”

 

 

 

EXHIBIT C

 

From: info@majesticpublishers.com

Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 12:14 PM

To: action@aclu-houston.org

Subject: FW: Patriot Act a.k.a. Communist Act

 

—–Original Message—–

From: info@majesticpublishers.com [mailto:info@majesticpublishers.com]

Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 4:40 AM

To: action@aclu-houston.org

Subject: Patriot Act a.k.a. Communist Act

 

Hello,

 

I am having a problem down here in Corpus Christi, TX. For some strange reason my IP formerly located in CC is now located in Herdon, VA. A web search revealed that both Homeland Security and Time Warner conveniently have offices there. I have noticed disruptions to my online activities and believe that our government may be violating my 4th Amendment rights among others.

 

Is there any precedent where internet and computer records of your home are being illegally searched and seized by the government thus violating the 4th Amendment? Are there any pending cases on this matter and do you think it would be a viable or frivilous claim?

 

I am an author and publisher. If our government is creating records of books we buy and read it seems plausible that they would also monitor books as they are written. I could be considered a mild activist and they would not be thrilled with everything I write.

 

Shortly after I joined the Democratic Party and hauled away some trash for a business that is owned by a man of Indian decent my IP changed to 72.183.57.73. I keep getting firewall breaches from the IP address of 72.183.57.69 just 4 digits away from mine. When I send emails to rr@abuse.com they do not reply. When I try to look up this .69 IP on whois websites I come up with the info below. Roadrunner still hasn’t informed me who owns this IP.

 

OrgName:    Road Runner HoldCo LLC

OrgID:      RRSW

Address:    13241 Woodland Park Road

City:       Herndon

StateProv:  VA

PostalCode: 20171

Country:    US

 

ReferralServer: rwhois://ipmt.rr.com:4321

 

NetRange:   72.176.0.0 – 72.186.95.255

CIDR:       72.176.0.0/13, 72.184.0.0/15, 72.186.0.0/18, 72.186.64.0/19

NetName:    RRSW

NetHandle:  NET-72-176-0-0-1

Parent:     NET-72-0-0-0-0

NetType:    Direct Allocation

NameServer: DNS1.RR.COM

NameServer: DNS2.RR.COM

NameServer: DNS3.RR.COM

NameServer: DNS5.RR.COM

NameServer: DNS6.RR.COM

Comment:   

RegDate:    2005-11-21

Updated:    2006-06-06

 

OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE10-ARIN

OrgAbuseName:   Abuse

OrgAbusePhone:  +1-703-345-3416

OrgAbuseEmail:  abuse@rr.com

 

OrgTechHandle: IPTEC-ARIN

OrgTechName:   IP Tech

OrgTechPhone:  +1-703-345-3416

OrgTechEmail:  abuse@rr.com

 

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2006-09-19 19:10

# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN’s WHOIS database.

 

I have not been answered by Time Warner in re to this abuse by this IP. This IP successfully turned off my firewall today. I do not know if it belongs to the U.S. Government or if it is just some hacker. Since Time Warner will not respond to my complaints I intend to also sue them for violating my civil rights. I am also considering to sue any technology companies that provide our government with this eavesdropping equipment that assists them in violating the U.S. Constitution.

 

Is there an ACLU attorney located in Corpus Christi, TX. that I should discuss this matter with?

 

Thanking you in advance.

 

 

Kindly,

 

Dale Adams

 

Majestic Publishers

Editor: Dale B. Adams

2014 Orange St.

Corpus Christi, TX. 78418

Ph: 361-939-8110

Http://www.majesticpublishers.com

Home of the new book, “Care Giving Made Easy – How to be an Awesome Caregiver.”

 

 

 

Press Release Submitted to the following media outlets on May 17, 2017:

 

 

 

Obituary of Nancy Ellen (Johnson) Adams, Mayberry

On December 26, 2016 Nancy Ellen (Johnson) Adams, Mayberry passed away in Harrison, Arkansas. Rosewood Cremation and Funeral of Conway, Arkansas T:501-327-7673 handled the arrangements. Adams Memorials of Charleston, Illinois has been hired to set the heart-shaped monument. On April 27, 2017 at Noon, Nancy E. Mayberry will have a family grave site burial at the Glenwood Cemetery Section D, Lot 344, Grave 4, in Shelbyville, Illinois. Nancy Ellen Johnson was born on February 9, 1944 in Shelbyville, Illinois, the daughter of James Noble Johnson and Edna Lucille Morris. One brother, James Robert Johnson preceded her in death. Two sons, Robert Sean Adams (deceased) and Dale Brent Adams and his wife Cherie Lynn Adams. Step Father-in-law, Chester Clarence Thomas (DOB: 02/03/1925) [WW II Veteran and Tank Commander under United States General Patton] survives at the Mason Point Nursing Home in Sullivan, Illinois. Nancy worked at Kraft Foods, Champaign, Illinois over 20 years retiring in 2001 and worked at Corpus Christi, Texas A & M for 6 years retiring in 2007. Nancy and her parents were members of the Westervelt Christian Church. Those friends and family members who can not attend can honor Nancy E. Mayberry by displaying love to others, something super sweetheart Nancy Mayberry was gifted with.